The current college ranking systems provide a simple means for prospective learners to see how one institution ranks against another. This could make for a straightforward method to see which schools will provide the finest instruction. At least that is what the position system is expected to do in recent years though there has been some criticism about the methodologies used to rank schools.
Before we talk about what is good about the current system and what exactly is not it is important to understand how colleges are currently ranked within the States. In addition it’s important that you understand that there is more than one position system available.
The methodology that the majority of us are familiar with is the ratings that are given by the US News. This system has existed since 1983 and each year the evaluations for colleges change. The US News rankings scores each institution using a score between 1 and with 100 being the best and they divide the schools into 4 tiers. The most effective schools are listed as grade 1.
The evaluations are based on collected data that take into account these factors:
Peers Evaluation standing of the school based on a survey of presidents, provosts and deans from other institutions. Retention the graduation rate over a 6-year period along with the retention rate of first year students.
A combination of data based on test scores of students the percent of top percentile students admitted and the student acceptance rate in general. Data that includes the student faculty ratio the typical salary of faculty members and the education degree of the faculty.
The difference between what the expected rate of graduation was and what the actual graduation rate turned out to be. The amount of funds received from contributions by alumni.
The very first four elements in the list account for 80% of the total score. Peer evaluation only makes 25% of the evaluation, which is where the criticism of the US News rank system comes in.
In recent years there has been some criticism of the current rating system. It is often said that using the weighting given to peer assessment, student selectivity and faculty resources that it becomes easy to decide which schools will come out on top. The biggest schools and also the richest schools will win out over the smaller colleges every time regardless of the actual education that a student can expect to receive from the association.
Looking at the historical data these statements are true to a certain measure. Schools like Harvard, Yale and Princeton always wind up on top of the list. Some suggest this to get a true measure of school performance the ratings should give a bigger weighting to variables linked to graduation rates, salaries after graduation and pupil performance in the very long term.
In spite of the criticisms the present college ranking system does provide a method for pupils to see how their preferred institution stands against similar schools in the nation. It offers a simple system to see where they could expect a toprated education and where they will be getting a second tier education.
With other ranking systems popping up each year additionally it is possible to utilize the US News rankings along with another rating system. It might be worth comparing the rankings in America to those of the Academic Rankings of World Universities or data based on the G-Factor methodology. Using multiple ranking system will provide a better overall picture when looking at any faculty.